![]() installing a rich selection of fonts sufficient for most users, is the less inconvenient way to deal with it. I would of course be happy to reconsider the installation of particular fonts, but I believe the the current approach, i.e. So personally, and in general, I don’t agree on the change you would like to see. Talking about fonts-noto-core it includes quite a few high quality and well maintained fonts for many non-latin scripts, and one of my ideas is to propose that also Ubuntu starts to install fonts-noto-core by default. Either you install fonts-noto-core or you don’t. But without repackaging the Noto fonts, you can’t cherry pick only some of them. ![]() ![]() As you can see the list of fonts provided by that package is rather long. You mentioned Kubuntu, and they install for instance fonts-noto-core by default. We also need to keep in mind that the way fonts are packaged for Debian/Ubuntu is a restriction. other kind of issues than the one you mentioned. I’m convinced that it would result in many more users running into fonts related issues, i.e. That’s mostly about trying to find out a sensible default font configuration.Īs regards the fonts installed by default, my understanding is that the goal is to provide a sufficient set of fonts so most users around the world won’t need to struggle with font installation themselves.Īs regards your thought about letting the installer cherry pick fonts based on language and geographical location, personally I don’t believe in that approach. Hi approach fonts from another angle: From time to time I have worked with modifying the default font for some non-latin scripts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |